Always crashing the same car.

I reconjiggered my reads again, in hope of reducing guilt, and found a casual think piece about machinery in context. Nearly every time I read Nate Hagens I have that weird tingly “We were just talking about that!” this time in how “special-interest democracy” was maybe born from free fuel enabling copious rounds of “oh why not, there’s plenty for everyone” throughout the planning processes. (I was the only one who thought this could be true. Notice that I keep letting dastards off the hook. I have to: if they’re really evil, suicide is on the table for me.)

On the other hand, says the tired head, this is another part of another conversation out there. Blogging can’t replace paid reportage, like individual conservation can’t replace systemic change. What are we getting from this?