Agreed, this is a cool map,
I mean, the one you, if you point and click
| I am the President o… on sliding toward a ’shock … | |
| eligible charity on sliding toward a ’shock … | |
| I am the President o… on sliding toward a ’shock … | |
| eligible charity on sliding toward a ’shock … | |
| I am the elected Pre… on sliding toward a ’shock … | |
| eligible charity on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| I am the President o… on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| eligible charity on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| I am the President o… on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| eligible charity on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| I am the President o… on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| eligible charity on ‘the Republican and Demo… | |
| I am the President o… on ‘the Republican and Demo… |
Cool indeed, but I’m a little too jaded to accept cultural values as anything but a neurotic house of mirrors. Self-expression, for example, is highly valued by every rugged individualist that belongs to the right wing hive mind. This is why every conservation with them includes an awkward, accusing, half wistful/half hostile reference to buttfucking and why they are adamant about their right to keep and bear arms against the hordes of brown people, black people, tan people, ebony people, people whose dogs bark with an accent, people whose head gear indicates a desire to steal their jobs, houses, cars and holiday dinners and people who buttfuck from time to time.
That’s, er, conversation, not conservation. I’ve been green so long that word just creeps in whenever it can.
The map misses the point of it all.
could someone explain to me why a lower price for a home is bad? it is not! now thousands of millions who could not afford a home, can – yes we can. change we believe in. yes.
As an economist, I believe I can explain. People need to keep embiggening their home equity in order to be eligible for bigger credit, which they need to cover life’s little frivolities, such as healthcare. Now if they could manage to take personal responsibility, they wouldn’t need healthcare, the need for which correlates strongly with bankruptcy. Bankruptcy, of course, correlates strongly with being unable to pay for the homes in which they keep the equity they need to borrow against to acquire the healthcare which keeps them working and thus able to service the debt that they wouldn’t have if they took personal responsibility.
If they could manage a smile or two, it would make things much easier, I must say. However change will come whether they make the effort or not.
i’m beginning to see why the modern economy requires a college education… or an art appreciation class…
“yes, must have been ten, fifteen years ago they laser-targeted the humanities program into ‘the fine appreciative arts’…”
Well if they use their home to pay for excesses, then they deserve to be homeless. Seriously, we need to get over all of this concern for the homeless – they brought in on to themselves.
Fact: if they lost their home too bad – there are plenty who want their home. that is just how it goes.
happy happy.
must have squat, to
there is such a thing as too much health care – just ask Cali Gov. and his Brown side kick.
we “pay doctors and clerks to stay healthy,” that’s a fine arrangement, everybody likes the wording and the important people like the results
I am just happy that multi billionaires are going to get more billions to save themselves so that they can save billionaires so that they can save multi millionaires so that they can save millionaires so that they can save the multi billionaires — see this is the great Circle.
too late, too late to form an insolvent investment bank
never too late – happy peOple lOve to give Other happy peOple lOts Of mOney – it makes the wOrld happy.
this is no tarp on my shoulders, ’tis the mantle of financial duty, i am the third cousin of a once-and-future wall street baron, pay me
but you have confessed that you are not a happy peOple.
under duress! inadmissible!